Cognitive Dissonance: What It Is And Some Examples
The term cognitive dissonance refers to the psychological discomfort that people perceive when something we feel, think or do contradicts our beliefs. It was first coined by the social psychologist Leon Festinger in 1957, in his work “Theory of cognitive dissonance.”
That discomfort can arise, for example, when receiving information that questions our deepest values. It is what could happen to a person who sees how his boss repeatedly abuses an employee and does nothing to fix it.
Cognitive dissonance can also manifest itself when we act and think incongruously. An example would be knowing that drinking alcohol is harmful to health, but we still continue to drink it.
In such situations, people can feel annoyed by not being consistent. To reduce this cognitive dissonance that we enter, what we most frequently do is justify what happens — it is common for bosses to abuse their power — minimize — a drink is not going to kill me — rationalize or even deny the consequences.
What is the relationship between cognitive dissonance and lying?
According to Leon Festinger, people feel a great need to be consistent with ourselves. Therefore, when we do not think or act consistently, a resource that we use to avoid suffering is self-deception.
Lying to ourselves allows us to relegate to the unconscious what is most difficult for us to manage. In this way, the fiction that we create in our mind stops bothering and is much easier to cope with. It is the mechanism used by people who perform immoral acts, such as stealing, bribing or committing a crime.
Or imagine someone who, for example, abuses your child. In such a case, the inconsistency between what he does — I insult my son — and what he possibly feels — I deeply love my son — is so great that the most adaptive form is self-deception. Not doing so would be too painful and unbearable.
Leon Festinger himself carried out an investigation together with James Merill Carlsmith, another social psychologist, to study the phenomenon of self-deception. Both concluded that people who deceive themselves take for valid lies as if they were true.